“Comprehension and Reading Passages: Improving the Acquisition of the English Language through Seminar”_________________________A Research Paper Presented toEdwin A. Estrella, Ed. D.
College of EducationBulacan State University-Bustos Campus_________________________In Partial Fulfillment of the RequirementsIn ENGL413C Language Researchfor the Bachelor in Secondary Education__________________________By:John Paul M. AldanaTimoteo A. Crisostomo Jr.Austin B.
Del RosarioCarla A. MagtotoJelica Ellaine M. ReyesAngelica T. RoaFebruary 2018APPROVAL SHEETThis study entitled “Comprehension and Reading Passages: Improving the Acquisition of the English Language through Seminar ” prepared by John Paul M.A Aldana, Timoteo A. CrisostomoJr., Austin B. Del Rosario, Carla A.
Magtoto, Jelica Ellaine M. Reyes, Angelica T. Roa has been approved and accepted as a partial fulfillment of the requirements in Language Research (ENGL413C).Edwin A. Estrella, Ed. D.Instructor742950-762004229100-76200Bulacan State UniversityCollege of EducationBustos CampusBustos BulacanFebruary 20, 2018Allen S. Valera.
MaedCollege ProfessorBulacan State University – Bustos CampusDear Ma’am:Greetings!It is our honor to inform you that we, the undersigned students of BSEd IV-J at Bulacan State University are currently conducting a research paper entitled ” Comprehension and Reading Passages: Improving the Acquisition of the English Language “which is a final requirement in the course ENGL413C (Language Research).In this regard, may we request you to be our adviser in this study? We believe that your expertise will be a great help in this endeavor.We hope that this request will merit for your favorable consideration.
Sincerely,JOHN PAUL M. ALDANA CARLA A. MAGTOTOTIMOTEO A. CRISOSTOMO JR.
JELICA ELLAINE M. REYESAUSTIN B. DEL ROSARIOANGELICA T. ROANoted by:Approved by:EDWIN A.
ESTRELLA, EdD.BUTCH STEPHEN C. DUAY, M.
A.E.ProfessorDepartment ChairApproved by:Allen S. Valera, MaedAdviserIntroductionReading performances can easily tell the difference between reading and comprehending a text.Learning English Language requires understanding of the language itself, it refers to the pronunciation and comprehension of the words.
Moreover, comprehension for some readers, find it challenging. Learners may understand the word separately, but putting them together to get main ideas doesn’t happen always as it should be. According to Serravallo (2000) comprehension is at the heart of what it means to really read by thinking and understanding and getting at the meaning behind a text. Comprehension instruction begins before children can even conventionally read. As children are read to during read-aloud, they are asked to think about characters, make predictions about what will come next, question and wonder what’s happening, and consider what lesson they can learn from the book.According to Kruidenier (2008) comprehension is an active process and the reader must interact and be engaged with the text for it to work well. It is also a strategic process which can be taught.
As comprehension takes place, words are decoded and associated with their meaning in the reader’s memory and phrases and sentences are processed rapidly or fluently enough to that the meanings derived from one word, phrase, or sentence are not lost before the next is processed. Yet, Reading comprehension can be described as understanding a text that is read, or the process of constructing meaning from a text. According to the U.S. Department of Education, despite noteworthy progress in recent years, one student in four public school eighth-graders lacks basic grade-level reading skills: they do not understand grade-appropriate material. This result is all the more troubling given that we know more than ever about teaching reading effectively.According to the U.S.
Department of Education, despite noteworthy progress in recent years, one student in four public school eighth-graders lacks basic grade-level reading skills: they do not understand grade-appropriate material. This result is all the more troubling given that we know more than ever about teaching reading effectively.In the late 1990’s, the National Reading Panel reviewed studies of reading instruction to assess the effectiveness of different approaches. The resulting report identified five areas of instruction essential to an effective reading program: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension (NICHD, 2000).This study aims to develop and improve the difficulties of the secondary language users through enhancing their comprehension skills by reading passages and giving them some exercises. The study seeks to resolve comprehension difficulties found in understanding the secondary language users.Statement of the ProblemThe general problem of the study is: How does the level of the comprehension understanding of the Third Year BSed English students be assessed and developed?Specifically, it sought answers to the following research queries:1.
How can the level of comprehension of students be determined?2. What is the level of student’s comprehension before the intervention?3. How the following factors affect students comprehension: a.
Background Knowledge b. Vocabulary c. Fluency d. Motivation e. Text g.
GenresRelated StudiesThe researchers gather different studies to fully understand the comprehension. And according to reading theory, comprehension is dependent on several cognitive processes, including decoding, word recognition, and knowledge. Reading comprehension is very important because it may be tested by a passage which is to be translated into good English, or by question based on the content of a passage. In this case the passage is not translated, the questions being asked in the foreign language and the student answering in English.According to Westwood (2008) in his study “What Teachers Needs To Know About Reading And Writing Difficulties”.
Stated that reading comprehension is often conceptualized as functioning at different levels of sophistication and referred to, for example, as literal, inferential and critical. The most basic level (literal) is where the reader is able to understand the factual information presented in a passage of text – for example, he or she can tell you the name of the main character and what he does for a living, because that information is stated explicitly in the text.Furthermore, this study can help students to determine their stages of reading, if the students can answer simple questions like what the author is actually saying on the given literature the student is in the “literal” level, if the readers asked what the author means is, by what is said, if he can read between the lines and make inferences about things not directly said. Then, the reader is in the “inferential” level.
However, the “critical” level happens when readers asked themselves why the author says what he said. Therefore, if the students can determine his level of comprehension, it will help him to challenge and encourage himself to move on to the next level of comprehension.From the study Using Poetry to Teach Reading Comprehension Strategies to English Language Learners by McCardle, Chhabra & Kapinus (2008) stressed that, “The importance of reading comprehension cannot be downplayed – it is very essence of reading, its ultimate goal.
Itis very individuals read. It is also where people most often fail in reading.”The researchers believe that a student or a learner should have patience when it comes to reading. Because, a learner wont understand anything if he want everything to be fast. It is not a game where in you have to make everything fast for you to be able to win.
In reading, you have to make everything slow, for you to understand and comprehend what the author is trying to say.According to Peregoy & Boyle (2005), metacognition is the process of analyzing our own comprehension processes or thinking about thinking. Specifically, good readers use metacognition to recognize and repair understanding when something they read does not make sense.In addition, metacognition is comprehending text through use of analyzing own learning or thinking process, this helps learner to understand a text well and a good reader doesn’t rely only on the printed text but the message underneath or lying in the text.Hedge (2000) asserts that the reason for pre-, during-, and post-reading tasks is to sense of helping readers to increase their ability to tackle and comprehend more complex texts. Finally, Hedge has highlighted activities that can be used to increase comprehension with post-reading activities. Some of these activities include confirming the purpose set for reading, discussing their responses to the writer’s opinion, using notes for writing activity, and asking follow-up questions. Moreover, these 3 reading strategies namely, pre-, during-, and post reading can help students to increase their ability in reading especially in comprehending a text.
The pre-reading is the process of skimming a text to track the key ideas before carefully reading from start to finish. It is also called pre-viewing. In during reading, once the reader’s mind is prepared, the next task is to interact with the text to monitor their comprehension. While in post reading, the task of the students is to summarize and reflect on what they have read. Meaning, the main goal of these strategies is to help the students to develop and increase their comprehension skills.Now a day everything is getting advanced every second of time.
Every day starts with something new. Whatever be the field, everything is getting advanced. Lots of researches and studies are carried out various subjects around the world. These updates on various fields cannot be included in the student curriculum. The students have to always keep their eyes on what new things are arriving day by day. This is where the seminars are of great importance. Seminars are capable of keeping the students updated with the technologies.
Seminars provide latest information about the things that the students need to know. They cannot improve their knowledge from textbooks alone. They must be take part in various seminars on latest topics. Seminars can be inspiring and it is a very useful tool for students.According to Washington (2008) A seminar may have several purposes or just one purpose.
For instance, a seminar may be for the purpose of education, such as a lecture, where the participants engage in the discussion of an academic subject for the aim of gaining a better insight into the subject. Other forms of educational seminars might be held to impart some skills or knowledge to the participants. Examples of such seminars include personal finance, web marketing, real estate, investing or other types of seminars where the participants gain knowledge or tips about the topic of discussion.Related LiteratureI Read It, But I Don’t Get ItTovani, who also worked with Keene and Zimmermann, is a teacher and literacy coach in Denver. In this book, she discusses why many children who have learned how to recite the words on the page still struggle with comprehension.
She believes struggling readers need to see how good readers think as they read. To promote thinking, Tovani asks children to write down what’s on their minds as they read. Tovani says writing makes readers pay attention to their “thinking voice,” the thoughts they have as they try to understand the text. By recording their thinking in the margin — or on another piece of paper — students create a permanent record of their attempts to understand the text. Readers can return to their thinking, revise their ideas and accumulate information needed to build comprehension.
In addition, the study of the researchers is all about reading comprehension and reading passages. So it is important for the learners to understand what they are reading because they might misunderstood what is the author wants to impose to them. In the book of Tovani, she discussed why many students read without comprehension. She believes that many students struggling in comprehending a text. Tovani finds a way to help the students in comprehension, she ask the students to write down what’s on their mind as they read.
Through that, it will serve as a basis or guide in making and gathering information to build comprehension.Reading with MeaningDebbie Miller, the author of several books on reading, outlines methods for teaching reading comprehension to elementary school students in “Reading with Meaning.” Miller discusses setting up a classroom where plan instruction around what students need individually and help those students with one-on-one conferences. Reading teachers, Miller believes, need to build relationships with their students based on trust and open communications. Miller teaches students to work with the same reading strategies Zimmermann and Keene outline in their works.
However, in the book, Miller describes teaching students to apply those comprehension strategies independently.Moreover, the researchers believe that Miller classroom setup plan will be effective, if we teach students according to their individual needs the students will easily understand the given task, and if we teach them individually this could help them overcome their weaknesses, build trust with their teachers, and feel that they are count.Significance of the StudyThe generalization of this study would be a great contribution to the vast knowledge in relation to students’ achievement.The vital results of this investigation could be highly significant and beneficial to the following:To the students.
They would greatly benefit with the study because they can get tip how they will improve their reading skills. This study will help the students to be enlightened their lack of interest in reading. It can also help them to change themselves for their own improvement.To the teachers. They will be informed about why some students have a lack of interest in reading.
They can make an adjustment in order to teach those students effectively and fairy. This study should make them aware what if they can adopt their classes to better to meet the needs of their students.To the other researchers. Who will be interested to conduct similar studies this study will be beneficial to them. They can use this research as their reference and additional information in making their research.
METHODOLOGYThis chapter aims to explain the methodology used by the research in gathering data for the study.Conceptual FrameworkThe relation that exists between the comprehension and the Reading Passages: Improving the Acquisition of the English Language can be conceptualized by using the paradigm show in Figure 1. 4935503297180Developed Understanding about Comprehension00Developed Understanding about Comprehension1551940320897Pre- Assessment Pre-Test, and Post-Test00Pre- Assessment Pre-Test, and Post-Test3226275310515Seminar”21st Century Readers”00Seminar”21st Century Readers”-165735299720Students Alternate Concepcion about Comprehension00Students Alternate Concepcion about Comprehension INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT OUTCOME464899620193000123388820059900293048720059900Figure 1.Conceptual Paradigm of the StudyFrame 1 of the graphic representation shows the input of the study which is the alternate conceptions possessed by the third year BSED Major in English about comprehension. Frame 2 contains the pre – assessment that is used to identify if the students have existing alternate conceptions, the pre – test to determine the level of their comprehension, afterwards the researchers formulated an intervention and after it was given within 2 weeks the post – test follows. Frame 3 shows the developed application that is used as intervention.
Frame 4 presents the output of the action research which is developed conceptual understanding of the students on comprehension.Methods of ResearchThe research design used in this study was the quantitative research design. The purpose of this design is to measure data and generalize results from a sample to the population of interest. This study was conducted at Bulacan State University Bustos-Campus.
The respondents of this study consist of the Third Year BSed English Major students from that school..Population of the studyThe target population for the study was 3rd year BSED English major students currently pursuing their studies in Bulacan State University – Bustos, Bulacan. Therefore, there are 110 total numbers of respondents where there are 83 girls and 27 boys.frequency percentageMale 27 24.54Female 83 75.
46total 110 100Research InstrumentThe researchers heavily relied to a multiple questionnaire. The questionnaires stand as a major instrument to gather the important data from the respondents. In order to gauge if the students have a problem in comprehending a passage, the researchers used 15 items each questionnaire that is gather from different sources. Data gathering procedureThe researchers personally allocate the test to the respondents to ensure the 100% retrieval of the questionnaires. The comprehension of the students was based on the given exercises. Other important data from the respondents such as age, gender, habits was personally retrieve by the researchers through survey form.Statistical Treatment To interpret the date effectively, the researchers will employ the following statistical treatment.
The Percentage, Weighted Mean and T-test are the tools use to interpret data. 1. Percentage This will employ to determine the frequency counts and percentage distribution of personal related variables of the respondents. Formula: % = f/n X 100% is the percentage F is the Frequency N is the total number of respondents 100 is a constant value2. Average Weighted Mean This will be used to determine the assessment of the respondents with regards to their personal profiles. Formula: X = Fx / N X is the weighted meanF is the frequencyX is the weight of each item N is the number of cases 3.
Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA)This will helpful in making comparison of two or more means which enables a researcher to draw various results and predictions about two or more sets of data.Steps in ANOVA1. First step is to compute the total sum of the squares.2. Second step is to compute the squares between columns.3. The third step is to compute for the sum of squares within the column4.
To complete the ANOVA table, calculate the mean of sum of squares RESULT AND DISCUSSIONThis part of the research presents the results and discussion of the level of comprehension, document analysis, and content validity administered to the respondents. Table 1. Level of Comprehension before the Seminar Score of the students Frequency Percentage Verbal interpretation 1-5 21 19.09 Poor 6-10 30 27.27 Average 11-15 59 53.64 Excellent Total 110 100 Table 1 shows the level of students comprehension before conducting the intervention, the table shows, the score of students, frequency, percentage, and the verbal interpretation, the data was gathered from the 110 students of Bulacan State University Bustos Campus through use of 15 item test prepared by the researchers and based from the survey it shows that 21 students got 1-5 scores which means that they have poor comprehension of the text, while, 30 students got 6-10 scores which means that 27.27 percent of students have an average comprehension of the text and the remaining 59 students got 11-15 scores which means that majority of the students have a better understanding of the text.
Table 2. Level of comprehension after the SeminarScore of the students Frequency Percentage Verbal interpretation 1-5 4 3.63 Poor6-10 15 13.64 Average11-15 91 82.73 Excellent Total 110 100 Table 2 shows the level of students comprehension after conducting the intervention prepared by the researchers, the table shows the score of the students, frequency, percentage and the verbal interpretation, and it shows that 4 students got 1-5 scores which is far from the `21 students who got 1-5 scores from the table 1 this means that after the intervention, 4 students will remain poor in understanding text. While, 15 students got 6-10 scores which is also far from the 30 students who got 6-10 scores from the table 1, this means that students with average understanding of the text has increased after the intervention.
Moreover, 91 students got 11-15 scores after the intervention which represents the majority of the students who can understand a text better.Table 3. Result of Pre-test and Post-testStudent no. Pre-test Post-test1 10 62 3 103 3 114 2 85 11 126 12 147 11 58 2 59 4 710 7 711 10 1212 10 413 9 514 3 915 3 1016 11 1117 12 1418 9 1419 9 1420 10 721 6 522 6 1223 4 1124 3 1125 2 1226 12 527 12 1228 4 1229 3 730 10 731 6 732 3 633 12 1434 1 1435 11 1336 3 1237 6 1038 7 1039 7 840 12 941 12 1242 7 543 7 544 6 945 10 846 10 1147 4 748 3 1249 13 1250 4 451 3 952 6 853 6 854 10 1555 2 1256 5 757 4 858 7 359 4 260 12 1261 13 1162 4 1563 13 1564 13 1565 3 566 7 967 7 1068 5 169 7 1170 7 1171 12 1472 4 573 3 774 4 775 6 976 3 877 14 1478 8 879 5 580 6 1381 4 982 5 983 5 884 4 985 8 986 13 1287 13 1388 3 389 2 590 5 591 14 1592 12 1193 12 1494 3 295 2 296 1 1197 11 1098 6 1299 6 12100 7 13101 12 10102 11 10103 5 5104 7 9105 6 8106 1 8107 13 11108 12 13109 7 14110 8 13Table 3 shows the result of pre-test and post-test of the 110 students of Bulacan State University Bustos Campus, the survey contains 15 item test that was gathered by the researchers from different sources, according to the survey the pre-test results 68 percent of the students failed to meet the passing score which is 8 out of 15 this means that most of the students don’t have an idea on how they will comprehend a text well, in contrary, the post-test results 83 percent of the students got 8-15 scores which means that the intervention held by the researchers help the students to gain ideas and tips on how to comprehend a text well.Result of Significant Difference between the pretest and post test scoreTo get the results if there is significant difference between the level of students reading comprehension before and after the conducted seminar, researchers used F – test. The table below shows the result of F – test using Microsoft excel. Table 4.
F computed used F-Test Two-Sample for VarianceVariable Mean F Value F critical DecisionPre-Test 9.350.860 0.729 Reject Post-Test 6.89 ? = 0.21The computed F value is 0.
860 is greater than the critical value of 0.729. The result suggests the rejection of null hypothesis and the acceptance of the alternative hypothesis. This means that there is a significant difference between the students’ level of reading comprehension before and after the intervention. The result implied that the intervention used in the form of Seminar is found to be effective tool in developing the reading comprehension of the students.CONCLUSIONOn the basis of the significant findings of this study, the following conclusions are drawn:1. Some of the respondents have less interest towards reading before the seminar.
2. Majority of the respondents developed their comprehending skill after the seminar, based on the post-test.3.
The action plan taken by the researchers helped the students increased their interest in reading passages.4. The tips given during the seminar helped the learners on how to make reading at the same time comprehending easy for them. 5. The learners loses their interest easily when the text seemed long.RECOMMENDATIONIn the guide of findings and conclusions drawn from the data, the following recommendations are hereby presented:1.
The student should understand and reevaluate what he’s currently reading is all about.2. Improve one’s vocabulary.3. Read for pleasure, for enjoyment.
4. Stop or paused reading when confused and try to analyze what you just read.5.
Other intervention can also be used in this research such as games, film viewing, and peer tutoring.6. Conduct the panel discussion to future educators that will soon teach.7.
This research must be better to have continuous application of the intervention to develop fully their comprehension understanding and focus more on the weak side of the students.END NOTESJennifer M. Norris, Hamline University St. Paul, Minnesota Using Poetry To Teach Reading Comprehension Strategies To English Language Learners ( April 2010) Retrived from https://www.google.com.
.0.nCwIdlr0iYU#David Raudenbush , Review of Related Literature to Reading Comprehension Written, Retrieved from http://education.
seattlepi.com/review-related-literature-reading-comprehension-2196.htmlShari Butler, Kelsi Urrutia, Anneta Buenger and Marla Hunt. Developed by the National Reading Technical Assistance Center, RMC Research Corporation The NRTAC expresses its appreciation to Elizabeth Goldman, C. Ralph Adler, and Robert Kozman of RMC Research Corporation for their editorial and production support. Original design by Lisa T.
Noonis.” A Review of the Current Research on Comprehension Instruction” 2010 Retrived from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/support/compfinal.pdf